Dr. G takes us on Sunday to the central park or Alameda located in the central part of the city. Take a look, he says after parking. I was stunned. All the faces were Indian. No criollos or Spanish bloods…nor any whites, tourists or even Germans!
All these Indians come from San Luis Potosi, Hidalgo and other poorer states to the south. Most are at least bilingual in at least one Indian language and many speak more than one Indian language. Further proof that even folks coming from very poor circumstances can learn more than one language – is there any doubt that anyone can become bilingual?
Dr. G explains that most of the Indian languages were called dialects but now are called languages. If they are not written and have some form of grammar, they are considered dialects. But essentially all the Indian languages in Mexico are now written and have established grammatical rules.
This is the Indian’s park on Sunday, he explains, if a Monterrey youngster comes here a group will soon surround him and ask him to leave. If he doesn’t, they could even beat him up…so much for tolerance. I tell him much the same thing happens in some parts of the U.S.
Not all these Indians are recent internal immigrants…many are fourth, fifth and sixth generation internal immigrants. But they never assimilate…it’s a matter of race. The Indian features and the Spanish features are very distinctive and keep the races apart...a hard thing for the outsider to understand. That is why so many Mexicans consider Angelica and I to be such an odd couple…
He explains that back in the 1940’s the U.S. implemented the Bracero program and 200,000 workers flooded into Monterrey. But only 100,000 found Bracero jobs; most of the rest just stayed.
To understand racism in Mexico today one has to go back in history. It is not a simple history, especially for the foreigner. And it is often not a pleasant one either…
The initial Indians that settled in Mexico were by and large peaceful, such as the Olmecs. This all changed with the arrival of the Aztecs. One theory asserts the Aztecs were originally from Mongolia and hence their war-like behaviors. They crossed from Asia at the Bering Strait and migrated to what is Nayarit state today. Supposedly the modern day Huichol Indians are their direct descendants.
Eventually they crossed the mountains to what is today Mexico City. Back then it was a lake called Texcoco. They were looking for a special place called Aztlan that they would recognize when a large serpent appeared to them. Legend has it they found the serpent on a cactus and today that serpent symbol is the Mexican national symbol…
What the Aztecs found were easy pickings. Various peaceful tribes were located at various points around the lake; such as the Tlaxcalans, Nahuatls and the Chiminecas. They had formed towns with names such as Tacubaya, Xochimilco and Ixtapalapa; many of the current municipalities in Mexico City. Prior to the Aztecs, these tribes lived in harmony and traded goods with each other. They would build small, floating islands in the lake called chinampas where they would grow their food.
All this changed with the Aztecs. The Aztec kings such as Moctezuma, Cuatehmoc and Tizoc demanded tributes of food, gold and young maidens and warriors that were to be sacrificed to the Aztec gods. The Aztecs were big on human sacrifice, a fact that creates a bit of a wrinkle for those proud of their Indian heritage. All in all it was still a somewhat peaceful arrangement unless of course you were the one to be sacrificed, ha!
This changed with the arrival of the Spaniards in 1518. The Governor of Cuba sent Hernan Cortez to explore the Gulf Coast and to see if any other Europeans were arriving there. But Cortez had other ideas. Upon landing near the current port of Vera Cruz, he burned his ships so none of his soldiers would be able to desert and return back to Cuba. Cortez had no Plan B. He was a man with a vision and his vision was one of the biggest conquests in history…
He soon heard that the local coastal Indians were paying tribute to the Aztecs up in Lake Texcoco. He knew that was where the real goodies were so he decided to go. He entered the area with less than 400 men. The Aztecs, thinking he was some sort of bearded Aztec god, accepted his authority with little resistance. Why his happened is still a matter of debate, but happen it did. To this day in Mexico Cortez is not considered to be a hero but rather a villain.
Cortez then decided to go back to his original mission and went south to explore what is now current day Honduras. He left some 30 soldiers behind to keep order.
But these renegade soldiers began killing the Indians mercilessly and the Indians ‘revolted’. When Cortez finally returned in 1519 he found out he was no longer welcome and had to flee with his 200 men in what is now called Noche Triste or Sad Night. Legend has it that many of the soldiers drowned as they tried to cross the lake loaded with gold; their treasure still buried beneath the streets and houses of the present day Mexico City.
Cortez returned to the coast and immediately began his strategy to reconquer the Aztecs. With the help of an Indian woman translator called Malinche, he formed allies with tribes that were upset with the Aztecs. In modern day Mexico calling someone a Malinche carries a very negative connotation….
Upon his return he had some Spanish reinforcements but also 125,000 Indian warrior allies. Without these Indian allies, he would have not had the military capacity to win. Again facing little resistance, he reconquered the Aztecs. He was a bit smarter then before and did not kill the leaders but simply put them under a house arrest. Once again, the Aztecs acceded and things became somewhat peaceful.
It is estimated that in the first two years after this reconquest the Spanish soldiers sired some 10,000 children. As more soldiers came, this figure jumped to 100,000 another two years later. Of course these soldiers did not stay with the Indian women and one has to wonder if this legacy is still present in modern day Mexico.
Right behind the soldiers came the Jesuits and other priests and they made the Indians slaves. These Indians worked in the name of God and were often worked to death and simply replaced by other Indians. Some historians consider the Indians in this period to be worse off than before, though it is a relative conclusion. Is it better off to be worked to death or sacrificed?
This whole story would not be believable if it were not for the first hand written accounts by a number of priests. But that is what happened.
I’ll leave the sociological implications to others but it does offer insight into the race problem Mexico faces today. Those of pure Spanish blood consider themselves the top of the class structure and those of mixed blood go under them. Those with more pure Indian blood, such as the ones we see in Alameda Park, are on the bottom.
The outright slavery eventually gave way to an indentured servitude. The slaves became peons and were given food and a hut in exchange for long working hours under the worst of conditions. Today in Veracruz the workers are still called peons, though in many other areas they are referred to as campesinos.
The Spaniards subjugated the ‘Mexicans’ for 300 years. It is hard to understand how this could have happened but when a conqueror has total economic, military and religious control, it is hard to shake; guns, gold and God. It requires an independence revolution and this one took three centuries to happen.
More than four centuries later in many parts of Mexico, such as Monterey, the Indians still have not assimilated. They can prepare food, clean houses and care for children but must return to their own neighborhoods to live.
The sociological consequences of this marginalization have always plagued modern Mexico but today are causing a great deal of anxiety among the upper classes. They fear a France-like revolt of the modern day marginals. Some think it is already happening – is there a difference in burning cars and stealing them?
In these marginalized neighborhoods an estimated 30-35% of children grow up with little or no education, parental guidance or public assistance. They become criminals at ten or eleven and later join the narco gangs. In these gangs they know they will die young but at least they will provide something for their families. It is odd to see mansions that are built in some of these poor ‘barrios’…
The problem of marginalization is certainly not unique to Mexico and most societies have the problem in one form or another. We certainly have it in California. When opportunity and the ability to assimilate are close to non-existent, the conditions are primed for the creation of gangs and other symptoms of marginalization.
In California this problem is complicated by the lack of English. If one does not know English, it is very difficult to advance economically and find more than subsistence employment.
It is a social problem that neither the U.S. nor Mexico has been able to solve. As well as many other countries…Creating opportunities is critical as it provides an alternative to subsistence employment or a career path of crime.
The solutions are not easy, cheap or certainly quick. But until the marginals are integrated into mainstream societies, all socioeconomic classes will pay the price. Modern day France is a good example…
Jack D. Deal